| Changing
athletics competition
Part 1 - analysis and principles for change
Preface
During the implementation of the Foster report
there were approximately 30 open forums regarding the changes
proposed in the report. A common plea across the country was,
"we need to do something about competition. It's a mess."
In the vigorous discussions that followed there were many
disparate views, a genuine desire to change and an overwhelming
sense that the sheer complexity of athletics competition meant
that meaningful change without alienating some sections of
the sport was impossible.
Furthermore there have already been two significant
reviews of athletics competition since 2000. Both reviews
involved widespread consultation and were communicated throughout
the sport. Implementing the changes has been challenging.
Our sport remains better at individual initiative than collective
agreement, but, despite the challenges, many changes, such
as event specific competitions and the UK challenge have been
initiated, and these have been broadly welcomed within the
sport.
This project will build upon some of the previous
recommendations contained within the 2000 and 2004 reviews
but will contain some significant differences.
Firstly the project will concentrate on the
provision of athletics competition for young people - defined
as 11 - 20. It will not address senior competition above 20.
The overall objective for the project is increasing
participation and improving standards for young people.
The project will also target athletics and
athletes below the elite. The assumption is made at the outset
that elite performance is identified and tracked on an individual
basis. At the same time the hopeful results of an improved
competition pathway will see more athletes aspiring to the
elite level so the connections across the pathway will need
to be consistent through the sport.
Secondly the initial perspective for the project
will be broader than athletics. Previous reviews have begun
with the world of athletics as currently exists. This review
will look at the changes in the sporting and social landscape
and how this impacts upon competition in athletics. Inevitably
this leads to broader questions about our sport and this report
poses some of them. Our sport needs to improve its image.
We need to look beyond athletics to see why our sport has
declined.
Thirdly the project will be split into three
distinct phases. Changing athletics competition is a huge
and complex task. The sport will need to reflect as it embarks
on the change process. The first phase is this report. This
report contains background analysis and some outline principles
for change. These will be discussed across the sport before
a second report is compiled. This will contain a vision for
the future of athletics competition and more detailed recommendations
to reach that vision. The third phase of the project will
be implementation - working to achieve the vision. A more
detailed timetable of the process is included at the end of
this report.
Finally, and most importantly, this project
wants athletics to become fun again. Our sport is amongst
the most physically demanding of all sports but that should
not prevent the overall experience being both motivational
and enjoyable. The best competitions provided by our sport
- Sportshall Athletics, the Great North Run and the London
Marathon manage to combine challenge with entertainment. Too
often current athletic competition misses the entertainment
factor and that is a key reason for the sports decline.
Introduction
The current landscape of athletic competition
has emerged over a long period of time in an uncoordinated
fashion. This means there is plenty of athletic competition
around the country and this is the result of the incredible
hard work done by volunteers. Any competition review should
start by paying tribute to all the many volunteers who give
up so much time to provide competitive opportunities. At the
same time many of the volunteers feel frustrated by the sheer
complexity that has emerged within the sport and when I talked
to them there was considerable disenchantment with the current
situation where events are often poorly attended and it is
a struggle to find enough athletes to compete.
There are at least 50 different providers
of athletics competition in this country and that number does
not include the huge number of road races and local activities
within every region and county. The consequence of this complexity
is that the delivery of competition is patchy and whilst there
are many well-organised events, many competitions exist on
a knife-edge with barely enough athletes to complete the schedule
and officials supervising jumps and throws with hardly any
entrants.
Furthermore the piecemeal development of athletics
competition means that the development of athletes (the athlete
pathway) is often lost amongst the many stakeholders within
the sport - clubs, team managers, coaches, officials, organisers,
schools, parents and many others. All have many strong and
often different opinions. Over the summer I have been meeting
and talking to many groups and individuals, however I make
no apologies that most of my time has been spent in discussions
with young people themselves. These are the athletes and if
our sport is to improve we need to listen to them and understand
them.
In listening to young people and observing
the changes in society the logical conclusion is that the
sport of athletics is in a far worse state than indicated
by the Foster report. The 2012 Olympics may provide a life
raft but it is no exaggeration to state that unless athletics
is prepared to change significantly in this country it will
dwindle and become a minority sport. In many parts of the
country this has already happened. If this happens the post
2012 environment for athletics is very bleak indeed.
The conclusions of this report are not critical
of any individual or organisation. The sport of athletics
is characterised by hugely committed individuals with incredible
energy and enthusiasm for our sport. But, in true athletics
fashion, many of us have been so focused on athletics that
we have missed the wider changes in society, which have contributed
to our sport's decline. This report seeks to address this
by analysing that wider social context.
If we really want more people to take part
in our sport and be committed to improving standards it will
depend upon generations of youngsters accepting the challenge
and organising their lives (and probably those of their support
network) around the sport of athletics. Currently we are asking
them to compete in a framework that has changed little in
the last 30 years. Thirty years ago - before mobile phones,
the Internet, Nike, CDs, police checks, skateboarding, computer
games, Sky Sports, the national curriculum, the road race
boom, the Premiership and the sale of school playing fields.
If we want them to do this, we need to understand
them and their lives.
The social and sporting context
The environment young people are growing up
in today is vastly different from that of thirty years ago.
We have all experienced many of the changes in society that
impact upon young people. A headline list would include:
- Different work patterns
- Fragmentation of family life
- Opportunity to travel
- Speed of communications
- Availability of information
- Choice of activities and lifestyle
- Insecurity of employment
- Changing opportunities within education
This section analyses some of the changes
and their impact upon athletics.
School
Until the end of compulsory education (approximately
16), school is the most common feature in young people's lives.
All of the children in this country will have some experience
of sport through school. The national curriculum ensures that
physical education is compulsory. However athletics is not
compulsory within the school curriculum and it is often squeezed
into the few weeks of a summer term during and after exams.
Unless a school has a PE staff that sees the
value in athletics it is under pressure within the curriculum.
The new teaching resource "Elevating Athletics"
has begun the process of updating school resources, but athletics
still struggles in its delivery and communication within schools.
If schools are unable to deliver athletics and athletics competition
the pressure quickly falls on athletic clubs who usually do
not have the resources to develop the sport within the school
environment. And the chances are that many youngsters with
potential talent in the sport never find that out.
There are many changes currently in motion
such as competition managers supported by the Youth Sport
Trust but athletics has fallen significantly behind other
sports within the school curriculum. Some other sports have
developed substantial initiatives within schools usually targeted
at recruitment or identifying talent.
Developing a coherent competition pathway
through an improved relationship between schools and clubs
is critical to the future of athletics.
Clubs
Beyond schools it is the athletic club that is the source
of the majority of athletics competition. As society has changed
the traditional athletic club has been under ever increasing
pressure. A complex network of associations and committees
has maintained the current competition structure but this
often causes huge conflict within the club itself. Coaches,
team managers and club committees frequently struggle to make
sense of the competition environment.
The result is a network of clubs across the
country offering very different experiences and with different
motivations. Some new clubs have rejected the traditional
model of athletics competition. Road running clubs have emerged
with a clear focus on the increasingly popular mass participation
events. Traditional athletics clubs continue to service athletics
as it currently exists but are often under-resourced. Many
clubs are split between a desire to develop athletes and an
outdated competition structure that requires incredible efforts
to fulfil.
All the challenges outlined in this report
manifest themselves most acutely in the club environment.
Young people will often make their first tentative steps along
the athlete pathway through an athletic club. If their experience
here is not motivating it is unlikely they will stay for long.
This means our athletic clubs need to have the resources through
coaching, competition and organisation to attract and retain
young people.
A well-developed club sector is critical to
the development of athletics.
Young People
Choice and the experience economy
Young people today have significantly more
choice in their leisure pursuits than any previous generation.
There is more competition for their time and more pressure
to fill that time with activities that increase their social
acceptance amongst their peer groups. In this context athletics
is a sporting activity that will be evaluated against other
sporting and lifestyle options, such as skateboarding, football,
computer games, activity weekends, ten-pin bowling, theatre
clubs or the cinema.
Young people will select from a multitude
of lifestyle choices and quickly reject those that are not
instantly engaging. Expectations are high and the boredom
threshold is low. Likewise the carers of young people lead
equally demanding and complex lives. If sports pursuits require
excessive amounts of time or travel, the chances are they
will be rejected in favour of other sports for their children.
The Experience Economy (Pine and Gilmore)
explores the high expectations we all have from our lifestyle
choices. Successful organisations and activities understand
the importance of creating an exciting and motivating environment.
The same holds true for sport. Sports need to capture the
imagination of young people. Unless they are motivated by
their experiences in a sport they will quickly move on somewhere
else.
In our sport this experience is best exemplified
by events like the London Marathon, the Great North Run and
Nike Run London. These are mass participation events targeted
at adults but acutely conscious the whole experience of sport
needs to be inspirational. It is not surprising that the youth
events around these road races are proving much more popular
than traditional athletics.
With so much more choice available young people
will sample sports and then move on. This means that sampling
a sport or event is not the same as making a lifelong commitment
to it. Athletics is a sport requiring considerable dedication;
therefore we need to find methods to continually motivate
young people if we want them to stay with our sport.
Sports that fail to engage young people quickly
and provide rewarding experiences will be rejected in favour
of other sports or leisure pursuits.
Brands, the team and the individual
Young people are increasingly sophisticated
in their understanding of brands. As society fragments brands
become increasingly important in defining an individual's
identity. Brands can be the clothes you wear, the team you
support or the sport you play. Young people today have more
personal power and more attention focused on them than any
other generation before them, affecting close to 60% of all
brand decisions taken by their parents. Young people's lives
are very different from any previous generation. 30% of 8-14
year olds text several times a day, whilst spending on average
2 ½ hours on the computer. (Brand Child - Martin Lindstrom).
As there is so much choice, young people have
strong opinions about the clothes they wear and the sports
they play. At the same time their choices need to gain acceptance
within their wider social group. Often their social group
is critical in determining what is and what is not acceptable.
Social groups often express stronger opinions on what is NOT
acceptable than what is acceptable. In other words social
groups will very quickly define what is "out" rather
than what is "in". The work of Richard Elliott (Being
Like or Being Liked) explores this critical area of young
people's development. Why is this relevant to athletics competition?
Because if social groups of young people define athletics
as "out", they won't do it.
For these reasons young people are often more
comfortable with the team rather than the individual sporting
environment. The team environment offers more security and
less exposure to failure. All of us from traditional athletics
backgrounds know that ultimately athletic success is based
upon individual effort but we need to be very conscious that
today's young people are very sensitive to failure in this
environment. During the early phases of athletics development
we need to recognise the importance of the team and social
experience.
Athletics needs to offer a strong social environment
in the early teenage years.
The material world
Awareness of salaries and financial rewards
has significantly increased in the lives of young people.
Transfer fees, salary caps and wage bands are the common currency
of the playground. It is often stated that the preparation
of an Olympic athlete is similar to that of a Doctor - 10
plus years of dedicated graft. When we seek to inspire youngsters
to move from participation towards excellence in athletics
we need to be conscious they will ask what the financial rewards
will be? Why should I train to be an Olympic athlete when
other sports or careers offer more money or more secure prospects?
On a journey to school my two teenage sons
asked me where I finished in the Olympics? Sixth. How much
money did you get? Nothing. Why did you bother Dad? Apart
from almost crashing the car it made me realise that the idealism
of an older generation has been replaced by a harder-headed
analysis of risk and reward.
Athletics needs to be aware that money and
career options are legitimate concerns when evaluating the
pursuit of excellence.
Decline in physical activity
There has been a well-documented general decline
in fitness levels amongst young people and an associated rise
in obesity. The DCMS annual report for 2006 estimates a 0.5%
rise in obesity amongst young people. By 2020 if current trends
continue 20% of all boys and one third of all girls will be
obese. Our sport is one of the simplest forms of physical
activity and can play a broader role in the health agenda.
The need for athletics is probably greater than ever, but
at the same time our current sport is intimidating to the
broader population.
Athletics needs to be more aware of the broader
health agenda and determine what our role should be with young
people.
Other Sports
Football is the sport that dominates the national
landscape. In terms of resources, popularity and media exposure
no sport can compete with football in this country. From the
Premiership through to local leagues and school teams, football
will continue to be the most influential sport for the foreseeable
future. Athletics cannot compete with football. The challenge
for athletics and all other sports is to find a method of
living alongside football. We need to work with football clubs
to find ways of using our athletics expertise and to make
our sport available as an alternative choice should football
be rejected.
Almost every major sport is currently reviewing
their competition model. A key impetus for this is the Long
Term Athlete Development (LTAD) model that is popular amongst
all sports. There is concern about attracting and retaining
greater numbers of young people, competitor burnout, over
competition at young ages and the problems over 16. All sports
are very conscious of keeping young people motivated and engaged
through their sporting development.
Many sports (hockey, cricket, rugby and netball)
are adopting the principles of LTAD. There is a challenge
to athletics because most sports are looking at "athleticism"
and how it can be delivered in a creative format (often competitive)
within their sporting environment during the earlier years
of development. The rationale is that LTAD involves fundamental
movement skills linked to agility as a basis for developing
sports specific skills. Therefore hockey may offer periods
of the year when you can train in an athletic manner for hockey:
likewise rugby, and to an extent cricket. These sports are
becoming more year round and are looking to develop more "athletic"
formats.
The underpinning principles of athleticism
are traditionally associated with our sport of athletics.
Our coaches and clubs could have the capability to develop
fundamental athletic skills, but unless we change our approach
and competitive format in the early years (11-14) we shall
lose this to other sports very quickly. The current coaching
format encourages specialisation at an earlier age than advocated
by LTAD. A real dilemma for our sports and coaches development
is at what stage to move from "athleticism" to event
group to event specific coaching.
Other sports are also ahead of athletics in
offering alternative competitive formats. These formats are
often short, fast and fully involving. 20/20 cricket has had
a huge impact on the sport but other sports (hockey and rugby)
are also planning new formats where they can deliver the sport
in a shorter time period on a more local basis.
Furthermore as stronger sports expand their
programmes to encompass a more complete approach to athlete
development, there will be less opportunity for weaker sports
to attract and retain young people. If rugby, football and
cricket can offer year round programme including phases of
training, summer camps and improved all round skills, where
is the time for athletics?
Most sports identify schools as the most fertile
recruitment ground. Cricket and rugby have programmes targeted
at schools. Cycling is a good example of a sport where an
entertaining recruitment programme has been developed by the
NGB, delivered through schools and linked closely to the local
club network (Go-Ride).
Basketball (which has huge potential) is currently
under review by Sport England. Basketball suffers from poor
delivery but is the sleeping giant of urban communities. It
has a compact, entertaining and flexible format as well as
offering strong cultural, music and social links.
Many sports are reforming their competition programme to more
closely reflect the lives of young people. Athletics risks
losing out to other sports.
Young people and athletics
The scope of this project covers 11 - 20.
Within this age range there are huge changes in behaviour
and lifestyle. In order to evaluate the lifestyles and experiences
of young people the target audience was split into three age
groups. Interviews were then conducted in a range of schools
around the country with groups within these age groups. I
have visited 8 different schools around the country and met
with approximately 400 young people. I have also visited clubs,
talked to current athletes, athletes who have dropped out,
coaches, officials, and schoolteachers and attended a range
of athletic meetings.
Sportshall to Boredom
I define this as ages 12 - 14, school years
7 - 9 (S1 to S3). During this period most young people will
have some athletic experience through schools. Sportshall
athletics is the most compelling indoor format for this age
group but there is a huge gap between this experience and
the transition to "real" athletics. There is little
progression from a fun, team oriented athletic experience
to competing in track and field meetings organised as a small-scale
version of the traditional Olympic format. At this age the
social and team experience is critical within sport and athletics
does not offer a compelling environment.
Many youngsters talked about their enthusiasm
for Sportshall and then their disappointment with "real"
athletics. Often they were persuaded to go to an athletics
club and then pushed into an event specific group early in
their athletic development.
At this age many other sports are offering
more attractive alternatives to athletics. Time and time again
the social atmosphere is mentioned. It is unlikely at this
age that youngsters have the confidence to take up athletics
without the support of a social group. Reception is critical
if we want youngsters to take up our sport.
Some quotes from youngsters included:
"I got fed up with waiting around for
ages."
"I got smashed and didn't go back."
"Prefer team games."
"Athletics is really, really scary."
The teenage (and parents') pressure zone
I define this as ages 14 - 16, schools years
10 -11 (S4 - S5). This is the period of increasing specialisation
within sport, when sports are competitive with each other.
This was recognised as the most desirable age for athletes
to begin the process of event specialisation.
Again the social experience is critical as
is time. As young people prepare for exams they are under
time pressures and sports need to offer formats that encourage
athlete development whilst not consuming disproportionate
amounts of time. For young people to remain seriously committed
to any sport within this age group, there will probably be
a major time investment from primary carers. In this context
athletics is amongst the most demanding sports not just of
young people but also of their support network.
Mention should be made of schools championships.
Everyone I spoke to who had attended the English Schools (or
a similar home country event) mentioned it as a critical experience
in their athletic development. "I wouldn't be in the
sport if it wasn't for the English Schools." However
the delivery of schools athletics at the local level is very
patchy.
If there is a highly motivated county schools
organisation working closely with highly motivated teachers
and a highly motivated club sector, Schools championships
work and can provide an outstanding example of sporting development,
but if any of the three organisational pillars is weak (either
clubs, schools or county) the delivery at the local level
can collapse. For every athlete who speaks highly of his or
her schools experience there are more who miss it, through
poor communication or a poor local experience.
In these age groups athletics becomes very
difficult to understand to young people or parents wanting
to take part in our sport. Confusion exists over competition
and what it means. Athletics often seems overly complex and
inaccessible. Entry procedures are often complex, there is
little linkage between events and athletic meetings can last
almost the whole day. One parent of a talented and enthusiastic
youngster described athletics as a "secret society."
As well as disappointing experiences there
are many examples of great practice at this age group. Usually
this occurs where a well-organised and motivated club works
closely with the athlete and the individual athlete's support
structure. Many clubs want to do more for young people but
do not have the resources or capability. Young people come
to athletics with high expectations based upon other sports
or other areas of their lives. If athletics cannot motivate
them they will often drift back to other sports or leisure
activities.
Some quotes from this age group included:
"I wouldn't know where to start to go."
"I'm better at 400m but football is everything in my
family."
"I got invited to the club but it clashed with football."
"I just sat there all day."
"I wouldn't go back to the club by myself."
"How come you can't get scholarships in it?"
"It got embarrassing because my Mum had to hang around
for hours and watch."
"I'd think about it but there's nobody to take me."
"My coach packed it in. I don't know whether to call
him or not."
Club Nights to Night Clubs
I define this as 16 - 20, breaking into 2
broad groups 16 - 18 and 18+ (defined according to the most
likely age when young people go to college). This is the period
of greatest challenge to all sport and to athletics in particular.
The lives of today's post GCSE students offer as many lifestyle
choices through education and work as were previously experienced
at 18. "All sport drops off the cliff after GCSEs"
- a quote from a PE teacher at a specialist sports college
where, by any standard, the support structures for sport are
outstanding. Social pressures, parties, the need to earn money,
the drinking culture and the fragmented delivery of sport
all militate against the extra commitment required to improve
as an athlete as this stage of development.
It is an irony that within sports development
in this country the school and social environment fragments
at precisely the age group where increased specialisation
and dedication is most required. Above 16 is the time when
most sports require extra time and effort. Above 16 is when
the distractions become greatest.
Statistician Ian Hodge has done some fascinating
work on English Schools medallists. He chose a year (2000)
and an age group (under 15's) at random and then tracked their
performance through the sport. Of the eighty medallists at
the English schools in 2000 only twenty-eight (35%) competed
in 2006. Of the remaining fifty-two, forty-nine of them had
packed it in with just three on the injured list.
There will be a story to tell for each of
those talented individuals. For some this will underline the
often-quoted story that successful youngsters don't make successful
seniors, but this ignores the many lifestyle and sporting
forces identified through this report.
There is huge wastage within athletics. The
retainment and motivation of young people through the teenage
years is critical to raising standards of performance within
our sport. Further research into this group of athletes indicated
that more disappeared in the year 2000 (when they were still
U15's) than in any year subsequently. Twenty-nine of the forty-nine
who have slipped through our fingers did so between 2000 and
2002 (in other words prior to them moving into the under 20's).
Although the data represents just one season this does endorse
the viewpoint that we lose most of our better prospects before
they are 18.
There is a huge challenge in providing the
support structures to young people during this time period.
Some sports identified a small number of talented young people
and find a method either through scholarships or academies
of nurturing the talented few. By definition this is the very
elite and the support structures quickly deteriorate below
this level. Often young people who fail to achieve academy
status are lumped into adult competition and this can stifle
their long-term development and interest.
As there are so many changes in lifestyle
and physical development competition as this age becomes less
about age and more about standards. This is also the time
period when many young people leave home; therefore the sport
needs to find ways of communicating on a more individual basis.
There is often conflict at this age between
the club league structure and the event specific pathway.
This is often most distressing to the athletes themselves.
Somehow our sport needs to find the maturity to reconcile
the best interests of the athlete together with our ambitions
for the athletic club.
Above 16 there is so much to distract young
people away from athletics, our responsibility is to ensure
that the sport becomes attractive and offers progressive competition
opportunities that keep individuals wanting to be involved.
Some quotes from this age group included:
"The travel was a nightmare."
"It was all too much effort."
"Everyone has to earn money. There's no time for serious
sport."
"There are two clubs. We talked about sharing a javelin
coach but they just kept arguing, so I packed it in."
"The English Schools was the best thing that ever happened
to me."
Summary of research and other sports
In summary:
- Young people have very high expectations
of their sporting experience.
- There is lots of competition for their
time from sporting and non-sporting activities.
- They are very sophisticated in their understanding
of brands, technology and sport.
- The social environment of sport is critical.
- Team sports are often more attractive than
individual sports.
- Sampling a sport is very different from
making a commitment to the sport.
- Many other sports are becoming year round
and have developed new formats to be more interesting and
involving to young people.
- Long Term Athlete Development encourages
the development of "athleticism" within sports
specific environments and this is a potential threat to
athletics.
- The delivery of sport in schools is very
patchy.
- Young people are growing up faster - they
face the lifestyle choices at 16 previously experienced
at 18.
- All sport "falls off the cliff"
after GCSEs.
Athletics: -
- Is a complicated sport that is difficult
to understand?
- Takes up a disproportionate amount of time.
- Has a demanding and complex competition
framework.
- Is not as fun and engaging as many other
sports
- Provides a mini-Olympic format that may
not be in the best interests of the athlete.
- Often encourages event specialisation at
an early age
- Does not value the social team experience
sufficiently.
- Has not evolved as society and the lives
of young people have changed.
In terms of current competition provision, athletics is a
supply driven sport. The existing competition model is fragmented,
historic and assumes athletes will turn up. This needs to
change to a structured demand driven model where the sport
provides competition to fulfil the needs of athletes. If we
can make the competition model attractive and motivational
then we shall start attracting and retaining more young people.
In turn this will lead to improved overall standards.
Principles for competition change
This report recognises the complexity of athletic
competition provision in the UK. It also argues that athletics
is in far more serious decline amongst the young people of
this country than has been recognised by many of those closest
to the sport. If athletics is to reverse this decline the
changes in competition provision need to be of a level unprecedented
in the sport's history.
The sport needs to recognise the huge changes
in the lives of young people and adapt accordingly or else
it will be marginalized. However, lasting change in athletic
competition will only be achieved by a combined effort at
the local and national level. It will require partnerships
between current competition providers, regional councils,
local networks and the governing bodies. In some parts of
the country these partnerships are well established or already
emerging.
Some will want to move ahead quickly with
competition change, others will want to reflect before moving
on. Therefore this report concludes with some outline principles
for change. Once these are agreed the more detailed vision
for the future can be developed.
- The core principles for athletics competition
are:
- Athletics competition exists for athletes.
- Athletics competition should be fun and
motivational
- Athletics competition should offer a simple
and logical pathway that allows every athlete to fulfil
his or her potential.
- Clubs and schools must co-ordinate their
athletic competition programme.
- Athletics competition must embrace today's
consumer.
- Athletics competition must be inclusive,
flexible and imaginative.
- These principles should be applied to all
competition within the sport.
- There are additional age specific recommendations
for athletics competition. These are:
Principle Rationale
At all ages the primary athletic experience should be local,
fun, within the region and recognise the importance of a strong
social framework This reflects the lifestyles of young people
and their carers - this will reduce travel times, make the
sport more accessible, exciting and motivating whilst providing
the security of a team environment where appropriate.
Under 13 national competition should be by exception only
Vibrant local and regional competition should be sufficient
to cater for this phase of athletic development
Between 13 - 15 there should be an emerging co-ordinated schools
and clubs framework to the national level This should provide
a clear, logical pathway through the sport, open to all, encouraging
broader recruitment and be more motivating to young people.
Over 15 this framework should be supported by graded competition
with open meetings and event specific activity. This will
enable athletes to find appropriate levels of competition
and event specific development as they progress through the
athlete pathway. This will help develop the individual athlete
beyond the team environment.
Next Steps
Once these principles have been agreed the
next stage of competition reform is to develop a vision for
athletic competition. This vision will be based upon the principles.
It will contain an outline of how athletic competition could
look in the future and a timetable for moving towards that
vision.
The vision will be published in spring 2007
after consultation with the home countries, regions and competition
providers.
The final phase this project will be implementing
the vision. This will begin in the summer and autumn of 2007.
|